Russia strikes back against the Empire (2/2)

This article is the second of two parts about Russia’s radical new gambit in its relationship with Western powers. In part 1 I covered the recent history of the conflict, its broader historical context as well as its economic underpinnings. This part discusses Russia’s likely response to the US/NATO failure to respond to her security concerns. The video version, which covers both parts is available at this link.

Clearly, the conflict between east and west is not over ideology or a bit of territory. It is about hegemony over resource rich regions of the world and this makes the two sides’ positions intractable. The Russians clearly understand this which may explain why they presented the Western powers with a set of demands so tough that they certainly knew they would be rejected. It seems that Russia really does intend to respond with military technical measures that will jeopardize western powers’ security. So far however, even among the Russian analysts, nobody seems to know what’s coming next.

Most of the experts and officials in the West seem convinced that Russia will invade Ukraine, but I don’t think this will happen. The media also made much of Russia’s deputy foreign minister’s remarks that they don’t exclude deploying military assets in Cuba or Venezuela, which can’t be excluded longer term. A few analysts including Scott Ritter suggested that Russians might deploy medium-short range missiles targeting European capitals with nuclear capable warheads.

The Kremlin will probably increase pressure on the US and NATO countries in multiple ways, but my own hunch is that their first focus will be on the Persian Gulf region which is strategically of huge importance to the West but where US positions are increasingly fragile. Russia could jeopardize western power’s security in that region by implementing “military technical measures” in support of friendly regimes, primarily Iran. It is clear that Iran is becoming an important component of China’s One Belt One Road agenda and that it is being set up as the cornerstone of their security architecture in the Middle East and the Persian Gulf. These developments also have the full support from Russia.

On 27 March last year, Iran signed a comprehensive 25-year cooperation plan with China which includes cultural, diplomatic, economic and military cooperation. On 17 September Iran became a member of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). Iran has also signed various security agreements with Russia and is in the process of negotiating a 20-year cooperation agreement modeled on the Iran-China agreement.

On 11 December 2021, Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Saeed Khatibzadeh stated that, “Like the 25-year cooperation roadmap we developed with China, we can do the same with major neighboring countries.” Clearly, the Iranians, who have pledged to throw the United States out of the region, have been increasingly confident in asserting their regional influence. Of course, the greatest challenge to Iran’s regional policy and security is the presence of American troops and military bases surrounding Iran as this map shows. The map shows the deployment of US forces as at January 2020. I’ve only crudely updated it to account for US withdrawal from Afghanistan.

Incidentally, the above map illustrates another reason why the hold on Afghanistan was so important to the empire.

Iran’s partnership with Russia and China will ultimately tip the military balance of power, so it was perhaps no coincidence that Iran’s President Ebrahim Raisi’s visit to Moscow was scheduled for Wednesday, 19 January 2022 – only days after the failed talks between Russia and the US in Geneva. In announcing the meeting, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said it was a “very important” meeting and added that, “Undoubtedly, among international issues, the ones such as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action and the security of the Persian Gulf will be discussed in the meeting of the Presidents of Iran and Russia.”

At the opening of his meeting with President Putin, Mr. Raisi said that the relationship between the two nations “should be permanent and strategic.” In his address to the Russian Duma, he said that, “The strategy of domination has now failed, the United States is in its weakest position, and the power of independent nations is experiencing historic growth.” President Raisi’s visit to Moscow was followed two days later by military exercises of Russian, Iranian and Chinese navies in the Sea of Oman, not far from the strategically pivotal Straits of Hormuz. The three powers’ show of force was an unmistakable hint that there’s a new sheriff in town and that the days of unchallenged US/NATO dominance over the region are over.

Thus, the “military technical” measures Russia promised if the US and NATO did not agree to her draft treaties will likely be made in support of forces that are already fighting to drive the western powers out of the region. Iran is obviously the prime candidate for such support and during his visit in Moscow President Raisi did not fail underscore Iran’s credibility and commitment to this objective in stating, “We have been resisting the Americans for 40 years.” Together with its proxy forces in Iraq, Iran will make it increasingly difficult and costly for the US to secure its control of the region.

Russia will not need to confront the US militarily at all – the US forces will simply be worn down and eventually pushed out in a similar way as they were pushed out from Afghanistan. For the Western nations which are already facing a worsening energy crisis, this could indeed jeopardize their security. But it could also have severe adverse effects on their economies and capital markets. Paradoxically however, for that same reason the western powers will not advertise that their control is slipping away; they will likely take their blows in silence and keep a brave face for as long as possible to keep the markets convinced that their revenue streams from the Middle East will remain secure forever.

I first published what I laid out here in my daily TrendCompass newsletter on 14th January, titled “Only a hunch: will it be the Persian Gulf?” I can confess, this really is only a hunch, based on my own reading of the situation. However, as events have played out over the last two weeks, I am increasingly confident that my hunch was correct. At the same time however, I couldn’t begin to guess how exactly the events might play out. For one thing, the uncertainty is probably part of the equation: Russia’s current gambit is very radical departure from the status quo and it should be to her advantage to keep her adversaries guessing and distracted in the wrong places. Indeed, it is possible that nothing obvious will happen over the coming weeks. All the same, we should not underestimate changes that are already taking place. As they compound, they will precipitate a collapse of the global order that has become entrenched for more than two centuries now.

How the coming changes will manifest in the West

Russia will probably not invade Ukraine and Russian bombs won’t start raining down on European cities. We’re living in the age of assymetric warfare and it is quite likely that nothing obvious will be captured by TV cameras. But the pain will set in and it will be real. I believe that the changes will be felt most strongly in our capital and commodities markets. Over time, we’ll see a very substantial rise in interest rates which will ultimately push stock prices into a real bear market. Unlike the limited and short-lived corrections we’ve experienced over the last four decades, a real bear market could be drastic and last a very long time. It is what happened in the US after the 1920s bubble and in Japan after the 1980s bubble.

In both cases we saw stock prices decline by over 80%. The US stock market took nearly three decades to fully recover while the Nikkei never recovered, after fully 32 years since the 1989 peak.

We are also likely to see a continued acceleration of inflation in most if not all of the G7 nations, as well as a gradual worsening of the energy crisis which could drag on for years. This could push the energy prices far beyond today’s levels. Even without factoring the conflict with Russia and based on the accelerating depletion of conventional oil reserves, the UK Ministry of Defence predicted in 2012 that the price of Crude Oil would rise to $500/bbl by 2040. Similar trends could materialize in other commodities including metals and agricultural produce, fueling a sustained commodity super-cycle that many analysts have been predicting in the recent years.

How to navigate the changes?

Of course, none of these changes will announce themselves in advance and it would be impossible to predict the timing and magnitude of the events any length of time into the future. But the one thing we know for sure is that large-scale price events invariably unfold as trends which tend to span many months and even years. For traders and investors, the most reliable way to navigate trends is to use high quality systematic trend following strategies. This is precisely the kind of decision support we provide through I-System TrendCompass reports that reliably deliver daily trend signals on more than 200 different financial and commodities markets. For reliable, opinion-free market guidance, consider subscribing to I-System TrendCompass daily reports. Subscription rates start from 85 Euros per month. To sign up for a 1-month FREE TRIAL, please drop us an e-mail to

Alex Krainer – @NakedHedgie has worked as a market analyst, researcher, trader and hedge fund manager for over 25 years. He is the creator of I-System Trend Following, publisher of TrendCompass reports and contributing editor at ZeroHedge based in Monaco.

BOOKS & LINKS: Please note, both my business titles are available as free downloads since Amazon cancelled me entirely but continued selling my books at vastly inflated prices. Links are below.


8 thoughts on “Russia strikes back against the Empire (2/2)

  1. Simon Fonov says:

    Have just discovered your site Alex, and enjoy your presentations and background theories. It strikes me that you must be familiar with the Rumsfeld-Cebrowski doctrine, as outlined by Thierry Meyssan – – which has directed US military actions, mainly in Middle East, for the past twenty years or more. Is this the case, and is this why you see Russia probably challenging the US/NATO in the Middle East sphere, in preference to Ukraine?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hello Simon, thank you for reaching out and for your kind words. I’ve never heard of the Rumsfeld-Cebrowski doctrine, but I’ve read Thierry Meyssan in the past and I always highly valued his articles. I think it’s time to revisit again…


  2. Simon Fonov says:

    As I understand it, the doctrine aims to bring ‘endless war’ to certain states in order to destroy state structures and thus provide the US with the power to determine who will have access to the resources. is one such article, but the site has a search facility so you will find many other articles on this topic. I would be curious to see if it gels with your own impressions of what is happening in those regions. And if so, how you further see that Putin might seek to counteract the US in the ME sphere.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Monsieur Poutre says:

    Hi Alex

    Russia is also making strategic moves against France (and through them NATO and AFRICOM) in the Sahel region.

    The Mali junta has signed agreements with Wagner which has already 400 personnel on site, 200km away from the first French base. The multi-national Operation Takuba, whereby EU SOF troops participate in the effort is all but cancelled, with all non-French elements returning home.

    It also looks like the new junta on Burkina Faso could very well want to diversify their security parters…

    There was an attempted coup in Guinea-Bissau last Tuesday.

    The big domino is Niger, where uranium and thorium mining is dominated by Areva which reportedly makes up “only” about 15% of France’s imports, the rest coming mostly from Kazakhstan (Katco, i.e. Areva+KAP).

    One could also speculate that the recent events in Kazakhstan were a Turkey-style provoked coup attempt meant to purge hostile Western assets, and that if push comes to shove in Ukraine strategic partnerships in Kazakhstan like Areva’s could be put in jeopardy.

    Sorry for being so long-winded. Keep up the good work! I really appreciate your out-of-the box thinking.

    Have a lovely day

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Sam says:

    Thank you Alex.
    Your posts/videos are always profitable, soul refreshing. They are straightforward. truthful (there is no such thing as subjective truth – truth is always unique, inmutable, independent of personal opinions), thorough, knowledgeable, bold.
    A question and a question/comment:
    You know of that US marine general that eventually came out to denounce the criminal nature of western politics, economics, finance, namely, Smedley D. Butler and his famous “War is a racket”. How is it that he spent his whole life as a praetorian guard of such system, and then – when retired – decided to expose their wicked ideology/deeds? His latter actions are to be appreciated, but his long delay speaks of catering for his personal well being while carrying out their murderous, despicable orders. How many people with a degree of love for truth and justice have lived and still live such double-minded lives?
    Regarding this man’s life experience; once you had discovered the true nature of hedge funds, was it then you decided to give up such occupation, due to moral qualms?
    My second point. It seems clear to me that contemporary western ideology is full blown – but artfully disguised – corporate fascism. Present-day virus/jabbing world-wide criminal policies are the most glaring latest incarnation. You frequently speak of the baseless, thieving nature of finance en the west; the economic set up leads to a relentless takeover of industry and commerce by private monopolies. Thus, governments execute the laws the national parliaments enact under the instructions of these private, worldwide monopolies. This is objective, publicly available information. Why is it then that the word “fascism” is never properly employed in our time?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hi Sam, many thanks for your kind message. To briefly answer, I’m well aware of Smedley Butler’s story. I expect it would be hard in his position to break ranks with the people issuing orders. As a soldier you are trained all your career to obey orders, which is rewarded. Had he declined earlier, his career would probably be very different and the coup against his government might have succeeded. With regards to hedge funds, they’re not uniformly nefarious businesses. In fact, most of them by far are simple investment vehicles that operate in the system as it is (they didn’t invent it and unlike commercial banks they don’t run printing presses). Some however, ARE nefarious and have deep state connections with political agendas. Indirectly, they benefit from banks’ printing presses (by issuing bonds that banks buy with freshly printed currency). If we rid the world of hedge funds nothing would change. We need to rid the world of usury and fractional reserve banking. We need local banking and probably multiple currency models. Regarding fascism, I think the reason people don’t recognize it is because there’s deliberate obfuscation going on.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. Pingback: West’s anti-Russia ‘Suicide Pact’, exploring Anglo-Zionist empire potential nuclear False Flag – Will Bristol reject ‘dictatorial’ US-style mayoral system next week – NOT The BCfm Politics Show presented by Tony G

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s